Lab-type development is one of the contract types
本帖最後由 ashamoni56776 於 2024-3-3 16:58 編輯Rather, agile development focuses projects on people who can put together programs with an emphasis on technical ability, so I get the impression that venture companies have more engineers who are good at programming. Employees of major system integrators are often in charge of upstream processes such as requirement definition and design rather than programming, and most of the actual programming work is left to subcontractors. There's no Scrum or anything like that, and I don't think it's suitable for agile development, which requires a sense of speed.
At GIG, our in-house development department is always in charge of the requested project, and we form a team that involves internal and external professionals depending on the development content. Of course, I didn't give it a shot. Point 3. Lab-style Special Data development is used While agile development can handle development where the overall picture is not visible, estimates tend to be neglected. Troubles may occur if the basis for man-hours is ambiguous. Lab-style development is said to be compatible with agile development and prevents such problems from occurring.
https://btleads.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Special-Data-300x191.png
in offshore development. This is a contract with a contract period of 6 months to 1 year, in which a dedicated team of engineers will be in charge of the project. *Offshore development: A method of outsourcing work such as system development to overseas companies. You can reduce development costs by placing orders with companies in countries with low labor costs. Since the estimate is the number of engineers multiplied by the development period, we can keep costs down, secure talented engineers for a certain period of time, and respond flexibly to changes. This contract type is suitable for agile development.
頁:
[1]